Determination Of Comparative Prevalence Of Insecticide Resistance In Anopheles Funestus (giles) In Ahero And Rota, Kenya.
Abstract
Resistance, according to World Health Organization (WHO), refers to the
development of an ability in a strain of some organisms to tolerate doses of a
toxicant that would prove lethal to a majority of individuals in a normal
population of the same species. Over 125 mosquito species are documented as
resistant to one or more insecticides. Resistance of mosquitoes to some
insecticides has been documented within just a few years of insecticides
introduction. The development of resistance to insecticide used in residual
spraying was a major impediment during the Global Malaria Eradication
Campaign (GMEC). Prudent use of insecticides in control of insects and in
agriculture should therefore be practiced to limit the development and spread of
resistance. Control programs that integrate and conduct regular surveillance can
detect developing resistance in mosquitoes.
The status of resistance in Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes
sampled from Ahero and Rota in Western Kenya to bendiocarb, DDT, permethrin,
fenitrothion and lambdacyhalothrin was lirvestigated. Standard WHO insecticide
resistance bioassay kits were used. Mosquito specimens were sampled as gravid
or half gravid females resting indoor on house walls and allowed to oviposit in the
insectary. The resulting FI progeny were reared to adulthood. All field-collected
mosquitoes were initially identified using morphological characteristics and
thereafter by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) molecular technique.
Mortality rates 24hrs post -exposure were 100%, (>98%) for all the samples tested
in all the five insecticides. Bendiocarb and fenitrothion always achieved ]00%
knockdown while Pennethrin, DDT and lambdacyhalothrin had their least
knockdown of83.82%, 77.35% to 83.33% within respective standard durations.
The insecticides achieved mortality 24 hrs post -exposure. Seasonal and study area
variation was insignificant. However, Ahero appeared less sensitive than Rota by
knockdown comparison, (t-test: P>O.5562 and teal.< terit.).Kdt95 values from LdP
line'" analysis suggested lower sensitivity in Ahero, (92.91, 79.52 and 162.25)
compared to Rota (55.98, 52.73 and 139.15) respectively for DDT, pennethrin
and lambdacyhalothrin, table 3.3. Overall results based on mortality 24hrs postexposure
indicated all the five insecticides in study could be used for control
purposes against An. funestus in Rota and Ahero. Since there was no resistance,
there was no difference in prevalence of insecticide resistance.
Citation
Agai, Derek Onditi. (2008). Determination Of Comparative Prevalence Of Insecticide Resistance In Anopheles Funestus (giles) In Ahero And Rota, Kenya.Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Applied Parasitology).Publisher
University of Nairobi School of Biological Sciences,