Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMugenya, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-28T07:12:32Z
dc.date.available2013-10-28T07:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.identifier.citationMaster of Arts in Environmental Policy of University of Nairobi , 2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/57939
dc.description.abstractHuman society depends on healthy ecosystem for their goods and services. However, the lack of market values for these ecosystem services (ES) has resulted into continued degradation through human activities in pursuit of economic development. Payment for ecosystem service (PES) has emerged as a market based approach that translates external, non-market values of the environment into incentives to encourage continued provision of these ES. Through PES, users of ecosystem services pay landowners who supply these services through land use activities. However, there are limited empirical studies evaluating the impact of PES. Kasigau Corridor REDD project is one of the PES projects being implemented to address both environmental conservation and contribute to alleviate poverty hence improving the livelihoods. However, there are no empirical data to support the argument that a PES project can achieve these two objectives in Kenya. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of PES on household wealth of those participating as well as find out how its implementation relates to land tenure systems that is, communal and private land tenure. To study applied the propensity score matching (PSM) using the ‘with and without’ approach. This was done through the identification of a control and treated groups under similar conditions and comparing the difference between the two groups from a total sample of 250 households. Using the logistic regression analyses, the findings showed that the PES project recorded an increase of 11.1 per cent on the household wealth and that community land tenure was more favourable to PES implementation compared to private land tenure. In addition, the total land and education level of the participants were found to also significantly influence participation and implementation of PES. In conclusion, the study has indeed showed that indeed PES can be used to promote environmental conservation as well contribute to poverty alleviation. In addition, households in community land are more likely to participate in PES, therefore, security of land tenure is key to successful implementation of these program.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi,
dc.titleEvaluating Impact of Payment for Ecosystem Services (Pes) on Household Wealth and Land Tenure:a Case of Kasigau Corridor Redd+ Project in Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherCentre For Advanced Studies In Environmental Law & Policy (caselap)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record