Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Saadia
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-13T07:44:50Z
dc.date.available2013-11-13T07:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.citationDegree of Master of Arts in Armed Conflict and Peace Studiesen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/58823
dc.descriptionThe project paper presented to the Department of History and Archaeology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in Armed Conflict and Peace Studies of the University of Nairobien
dc.description.abstractA common assertion is that women are victims during conflict. Although often suggested, women are not always victims. Sometimes they take part in the conflict yet this claim has received little scrutiny. Hence, this study evaluates the roles of Degodia and Ajuran women in conflict using the structural functionalism and actor analysis theories. These approaches hold that armed conflict may generate feelings within members of society and examining whether the feelings generate responses. This is what the study investigated in relation to the role played by women during conflict between the Degodia and Ajuranof wajir county. This approach distinguishes between some of the explanations given in previous literature. The most common school of thought is that is that women are always the victims during conflict. But research has shown that that the victims are also closely associated with conflict whose effects make them more likely to participate in the real conflict .This work examines the main the factors that led to the bloody conflict between Degodia and Ajuran of Wajir County,and has gone into great depths to reveal that women are not always the victims in times of conflict. on the women side who end up taking part in armed conflict. Adapting this approach enables an empirical distinction between some of the explanations proposed in previous literature. These explanations are very diverse; even so, they have not been separated systematically in previous empirical analyses. First, it is hypothesized that women are victims during conflict. But research from elsewhere shows that victims are also associated with conflict whose effects make them more likely to take part in conflict. This work discusses the main factors responsible for the entrenched conflict between the Ajuran and the Degodia of North Eastern Kenya. The study revealed the adverse effects of the conflict on the people of the region particularly in terms of insecurity that influenced the women to take part in the conflict. It points out that Degodia-Ajuran of Wajir county conflict has undergone fundamental transformation from a cultural practice to modern warfare organised and bankrolled by warlords. The study also points out that the major losers in this environment of insecurity are the small and poor peasants who have been pauperised and turned into destitute. The study has also shown the multifaceted roles of women during the conflict situations in their Degodia and Ajuran communities in Wajir as mediators, combatants, caregivers and even economic providers for the family. As mediators the women have either individually or collectively preached peace to the youths and men of their communities. They have appealed to both the stake holders and the people of the community to lay down arms to negotiate. In terms of care giving, the process includes not just the usual domestic affair of caring for the family and home but, it also includes tending to the sick and wounded youths engaged in combating, caring both emotionally and physically.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleThe role of Somali women in conflict: the case of the Degodia and Ajuran Clans of Wajir County, 1964-1984en
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherFaculty of Artsen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record