Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmollo, Pauline M
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-18T10:07:59Z
dc.date.available2013-11-18T10:07:59Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.citationA Research Project Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirement For The Award Of The Degree Of Master Of Business Administration School Of Business, University Of Nairobi.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/59261
dc.description.abstractChange is a constant in today’s organizations. The exchange relationship between organization and employee ranges the entire contract spectrum from strictly legal to purely psychological. Violation of the psychological contract occurs when one party perceives that the other has failed to fulfill its obligations or promises. The experience of psychological contract violation, involving a breach of promise and trust, goes beyond disappointment and produces feelings of betrayal. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between perceptions of psychological contract violation and employees’ commitment to implementation of strategic change at the Barclays Bank of Kenya. The study applied case study design where only one organization was involved in the study. The study also applied descriptive research design since the respondents were required to describe the phenomenon. A structured questionnaire was used to collect primary data which informed the analysis. Collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean, frequency distribution and standard deviations. The study established that there was need to strategize on factors such as delayed job promotions, low and inconsistent payment of bonuses, fair performance ratings, communication within the bank, adequate training on how to handle change, adequate preparation for the change programme and good leadership of the change process as they influenced the employees commitment to implementation of strategic change. The study further established that from the above analysis it can be concluded that casual discussions with line managers, informal promises by line managers, delay in their annual pay rise and payment of overtime or flex time for worked hours neutrally affected employees’ commitment to implementation of strategic change. The study recommends that employers have to know what their employees expect from their work. The psychological contract is valuable because it recognizes the individualization of the employment relationship. Both parties in the employment relationship that is the employer and employee have their own views on the mutual obligations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleRelationship Between Perceptions of Psychological Contract Violation and Employees’ Commitment to Implementation of Strategic Change at the Barclays Bank of Kenya, Nairobien
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of Businessen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record