dc.contributor.author | Mutua, FM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-25T12:24:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-04-25T12:24:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1994 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hydrological Sciences Journal 1994 Vol. 39 No. 3 pp. 235-244 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0262-6667 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19941906365.html?resultNumber=4&q=mutua+f+2014 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11295/66008 | |
dc.description.abstract | The results of the chi-square goodness-of-fit test were compared with those of the more objective Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in order to identify the optimum peak-flow probability model for use in flood frequency analysis. Nine probability functions were investigated. These included 7 three-parameter distribution functions (log-normal, Pearson, log-Pearson, Fisher-Tippet, log-Fisher-Tippet, Walter Boughton and log-Walter Boughton) and 2 five-parameter density functions (Wakeby and log-Wakeby). The data used comprised the annual peak discharge from the average daily records for 60 river gauging stations within 5 major river basins of Kenya. The AIC test isolated the Wakeby and the three-parameter log-normal distributions equally but significantly from all the other distributions considered in the study. Because of the complexity of the Wakeby distribution the three-parameter log-normal distribution was considered to the best model for use in flood frequency analyses in Kenya. One of the worst fitting models was the log-Pearson distribution | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Nairobi, | en_US |
dc.title | The use of the Akaike Information Criterion in the identification of an optimum flood frequency model. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |