Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMutua, FM
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-25T12:24:39Z
dc.date.available2014-04-25T12:24:39Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.citationHydrological Sciences Journal 1994 Vol. 39 No. 3 pp. 235-244en_US
dc.identifier.issn0262-6667
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19941906365.html?resultNumber=4&q=mutua+f+2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/66008
dc.description.abstractThe results of the chi-square goodness-of-fit test were compared with those of the more objective Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) in order to identify the optimum peak-flow probability model for use in flood frequency analysis. Nine probability functions were investigated. These included 7 three-parameter distribution functions (log-normal, Pearson, log-Pearson, Fisher-Tippet, log-Fisher-Tippet, Walter Boughton and log-Walter Boughton) and 2 five-parameter density functions (Wakeby and log-Wakeby). The data used comprised the annual peak discharge from the average daily records for 60 river gauging stations within 5 major river basins of Kenya. The AIC test isolated the Wakeby and the three-parameter log-normal distributions equally but significantly from all the other distributions considered in the study. Because of the complexity of the Wakeby distribution the three-parameter log-normal distribution was considered to the best model for use in flood frequency analyses in Kenya. One of the worst fitting models was the log-Pearson distributionen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi,en_US
dc.titleThe use of the Akaike Information Criterion in the identification of an optimum flood frequency model.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record