Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAleri, J.W
dc.contributor.authorNguhiu, J.M
dc.contributor.authorMogoa, E.M
dc.contributor.authorMulei, C.M
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-24T07:40:37Z
dc.date.available2014-07-24T07:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationUniversity of Nairobi College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 8th Biennial Scientific Conference and The 46th Kenya Veterinary Association Annual Scientific Conference and The 12th World Veterinary Day Celebrationsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/73288
dc.description.abstractAnimal welfare is defined as the ability of an animal to interact comfortably with its environment through its physiological, psychological and behavioural systems. About 70% of dairy production in Kenya is from the smallholder production systems. These production systems are negatively impacted by a number of factors including poor nutrition, substandard husbandry and management practices, lack of appropriate farm inputs, diseases and low incomes. These factors influence the welfare of dairy cattle, hence their importance for its evaluation. This study was therefore designed with the aim of determining the welfare of dairy cattle in the smallholder production units in Nairobi and its environs. This was achieved through a cross-sectional study carried out in 80 smallholder dairy units purposively selected in Nairobi and its environs, in which 306 dairy cows were examined. The welfare of cattle in these dairy units was evaluated through several methods which included: visual observations for animal- and farm-level factors that indicate poor welfare of cattle; taking measurements of dairy housing unit dimensions such as cubicle, walk-alley, kerb and feeding bunk; and using a structured questionnaire to interview farmers and stockmen on nutritional regimes and other management practices such as removal of slurry, milking techniques, record keeping and disease control. These factors were recorded and later analyzed. Analyses included descriptive statistics, and 20 simple associations using chi-square at p< 0.05 significance level. Over 80% of these smallholder units had factors that contributed to poor welfare of dairy cattle. These factors included under-size cubicles, small walk-alleys, too high feeding bunks with traumatic edges, too low positioning of neck rails at the feed bunks, sharp objects and edges within the housing units and dilapidated housing structures. The main evidence of poor welfare was injuries on the animals. The body condition score (BCS) of the cows was the main indicator of welfare relating to feeding. The famers’ and stockmen’s attitude towards animal welfare was poor as evidenced by negative response and poor perception when interviewed about the five freedoms. This study concludes that poor welfare of dairy cattle exists in all the smallholder units evaluated, which is mainly caused by improper housing and management. Training of farmers and stockmen on animal welfare issues would therefore be a prerequisite to improvement of dairy cattle welfare. Research on the physiological response to poor welfare of dairy cows in the smallholder units needs to be carried out to enhance the understanding of the impact of these risk factors on smallholder dairy animals.en_US
dc.titleChallenges in the smallholder (zero-grazing) production systems of Nairobi and its environs: A welfare perspectiveen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record