Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuthui, Patrick M
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T12:53:57Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T12:53:57Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMaster of Artsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/76141
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to analyze the fertility levels and trends in Kenya using the projected parity progression ratios. It sought to establish whether the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) computed from the projected PPRs approach is the same as the one obtained from the conventional approach. The study pursued several objectives. The first, was determine the PPRs for women who have completed child bearing and project the expected PPRs for younger women. The second was to determine whether the projected PPRs for 1999 differ from the observed PPRs 2009. The third was to compute TFR from the projected PPRs approach and establish whether it is the same as the one from the conventional method. Data was obtained from 1999 and 2009 censuses. The sample size was 10 percent of all the households in Kenya in 1999 and 2009, which was 771,097 and 1,047,671 women respectively. For completed fertility, women aged 45 to 64 years were used; while for projected fertility, women aged 15 to 44 years were used. The main method of analysis was the projected PPRs approach. Comparisons were made between the completed PPRs and the unprojected PPRs in 1999 as well as between projected PPRs for 1999 and observed PPRs in 2009 for the same age cohort. Graphical methods were used to make the comparisons clearer. Further, TFR was computed and compared from that obtained from other methods. The findings show a slight difference in the projected and the observed PPRs for the same age cohort in the two successive censuses. The TFR was 4.6 in 1999 and 4.4 in 2009 using the projected PPRs approach. On the other hand, the TFR obtained using the conventional approach for the two years respectively was 4.8 and 4.6 based on Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS). Clearly, the absolute difference between the two estimates was 0.2, hence the two TFRs are comparable. The main implication from the results is that if all the births in the past 12 months preceding the census date are not sampled, the TFR from the projected approach would be lower than it should. The study recommends that a variety of methods should be used in the calculation of TFR in Kenya, in order to compare whether the same fertility levels are arrived at. Future studies could investigate the progression from marriages to first birth, or first birth to marriage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleEstimation of Fertility in Kenya Using the Projected Parity Progression Ratios: Evidence From 1999 and 2009 Censusesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record