| dc.description.abstract | Devolution transfers responsibilities for services to local governments that elect their own officials,
raise their own revenue and have independent authority to make investment decisions. African
countries have increasingly adopted devolution as a strategy to improve governance and remedy
institutional deficiencies that highly centralized governments have engendered. These include
bureaucratic inefficiencies, poor accountability and transparency, unequal distribution of resources
and low levels of community participation in development. The structure of government was
changed radically in the new constitution so as to position devolution at the core of national life.
Chapter eleven of the constitution of Kenya provide for devolution, its objects and principles, the
county governments, functions and powers of the national and county governments and
relationships between the two levels of governments. To achieve these objectives, the constitution
established 47 county governments in addition to the national government. Each county has a
government consisting of County assembly and County Executive. At the heart of the clamor for a
new constitution was a determination by the people of Kenya to devolve governance and decision
making so as to give them a greater say in how they and their resources are governed. Therefore,
Kenyans have had high hopes for devolution so that they could change the kind of governance to
have a government characterized by accountability, effectiveness, efficiency and responsiveness.
Although efforts have been made to devolve governance in the past, the central government has
always played an active role in undermining the same efforts hence the long history of unequal
distribution of resources, poverty, exclusion of minorities, marginalization of some regions and
communities of the country and thereby skewed development. These mistakes can only be, to
some extent, rectified through the proper establishment and operationalization of devolved
governance so that the locals can manage and account for their own resources.
The main objective of this study was to examine the on-going establishment of the devolved
government in Machakos County, Kenya, achievement and limitations. The study sought to
explore the structures being put in place, the human and financial resources being deployed and the
harmonization of the two levels of governments in service delivery.
The study was exploratory and took a qualitative approach in data collection where key informants
were purposively selected. Key Informant interview guides were used to guide data collection.
Collected data was organized, summarized and presented in direct quotations of relevant verbatim
responses and selected comments.
stages. Two structures have been established in the County government of Machakos using the
right procedures, we have two sources of finance that have been deployed in Machakos County
with proper organizational financial management structure. In terms of human resource, we have
the staff that was seconded by TA to the Counties, the staff seconded by the national government
from the now defunct Local Authorities and the staff that had been recruited by the county and
also the ones who were being recruited. There is harmony between the national and the County
government when it comes to service delivery. In the ongoing establish | en_US |
