Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoses, Peter M
dc.contributor.authorOdero, Nicodemus A
dc.contributor.authorMbuthia, JM
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T11:59:36Z
dc.date.available2014-12-20T11:59:36Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 11, November 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/78166
dc.description.abstractDue to the increased importance of DFIGs in optimization of real and reactive power losses and the maintenance of voltage profile, the general methods of DG placement and sizing in the existing literature cannot be of practical importance in DFIG .In this paper a pure PSO method used in general DG is compared with a HGAPSO in the siting and sizing of DFIG with the objective of minimizing power losses .The corresponding Combined participation factors are assigned using the DFIG Domain Distributed Slack Bus Model and a comparison made on the two schemes of loss minimization. The obtained results for the real and reactive power losses and voltage voltage profile illustrate the DFIG need in the modern power systemen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleReducing real and reactive power losses in the distribution system by DFIG placement and sizing using ordinary PSO and HGPSO : a comparisonen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record