Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMule, John G
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-25T06:02:06Z
dc.date.available2015-03-25T06:02:06Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/81609
dc.description.abstractLand being an essential factor of production the world over has remained dynamic due to changes in land uses over time. It determines the socio-cultural and economic basis of most societies in the world. Since the scramble for Africa through to independence struggle in all African countries and thereafter land has been at the centre stage. Independent Kenya's efforts for fast socio-economic development included programs like land adjudication/consolidation and settlement. In both of these programs, existing customary land rights on trust lands as exercised by local communities were ultimately registered as individual or communal holdings like group ranches purposely to facilitate sustainable socio-economic development and environmental stability. Group ranches which are huge communal land holdings established under the Land (Group representatives) Act Cap 287 of 1968 Laws of Kenya at the completion of many land adjudication programmes. The ranches are very useful to pastoralist community members for settlement and as sources of pasture for their livestock mostly because the common land ownership allows mobility which is critical coping strategy for pastoralists in Kenya's dry lands. However, due to internal forces related to their management operations (courtesy of lack of group ranch constitutions) these ranches came under pressure to subdivide in less than ten years after formation ushering in a scenario which does not easily support pastoralism!ranching way of life. After concerted debate the government conceded to group ranch subdivision in the late 1980s.Earlier on the land adjudication program which bore KimanaiTikodo group ranch had started in 1970 and the ranch was thereafter incorporated in the yearl972 under the Land (Group representatives) Act Cap 287 Laws of Kenya. After twenty (20) years of operation the ranch was consented for subdivision in 1992 after dissolution and subdivision resolution was passed by the group members in a general meeting the same year. All of KimanaiTikodo group ranch and a small portion of Ogulului/Ololarash ranch among others in Loitokitok District have todate been subdivided. The whole process and outcome has depicted lack of adequate land management policy of Group Ranches in Kenya. The subdivision of these ranches has got developers and environmental researchers worried of increasing loss of grassland for livestock as land fragmentation is expected to increase due to population growth, increased authority of individual land owners to open up their land or sale and more so fence it to maximize individual benefits from it. This scenario will compel the group members to limit their herd sizes due to shrinking common pastures and water. It is within this background that this study was formulated, to determine the impacts of land subdivision of Kimana Group Ranch and to suggest mitigation strategies. The main objective of the study was to examine the socio-economic impacts of the subdivision on the pastoral households of this ranch in order to make an informed policy recommendation on matters of land management , since the inception of land subdivisions or individualizations in the dry lands. i KimanaiTikodo group ranch was selected as the focus of the study because of its location within the varied and ecologically dry land ecosystems adjacent to Amboseli National Park and Tsavo National Park on the eastern side; more so, the ranch is the first to be fully subdivided unlike many in Loitokitok District. Unresolved negative impacts of subdivision of Kimana Group Ranch will have wider consequences to local livelihoods unless appropriate policy interventions are made. Questionnaires were administered to respondents during the study; four research sites were identified based on socio-economic activities in place and their distance from the park, and interview conducted on 86 respondents. Results show that generally, land use has not changed much from pastoral use despite the land subdivision. Land use near the Amboseli National Park has been influenced by land sales and leases. Lease is the most preferred land tenure arrangement in the area and most of the land portions have been put under commercial uses and urban settlement. Most land owners in the ranch have not received the most preferred land tenure arrangement in the area and most of the land portions have been put under commercial uses and urban settlement. Most land owners in the ranch have not received their title deeds and most of them are not interested in selling their land. Impacts on the land are observed to be minimal in the short run but more pronounced at Noomayianat area as the community in this area increases settlement and agriculture to merge with the Loitoktok agricultural areas near Impiron .However it has been observed that pastoralist household incomes have decreased with the onset of land subdivision. Appropriate mitigation measures geared mainly to new land use planning and management styles to retain the grasslands unopened with a view to fostering sustainable development in Kimana and other Dry lands are suggested in this document
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleSocio - economic impacts of land subdivision in Kenya’s drylands: A case study of Kimana/Tikodo group ranch in Loitoktok Di stricten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialesen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record