Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNdetei, David M
dc.contributor.authorLewis-Fernández, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorAvelar, Yesi
dc.contributor.authorLam, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBoiler, Marit
dc.contributor.authorNicasio, Andel
dc.contributor.authorJadhav, Sushrut
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, Smita
dc.contributor.authorParalikar, Vasudeo
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Mitchell
dc.contributor.authorLosif, Ana-Maria
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, Neil
dc.contributor.authorHinton, Ladson
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-31T06:54:55Z
dc.date.available2015-03-31T06:54:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationHinton, Ladson, Neil Aggarwal, Ana-Maria Iosif, Mitchell Weiss, Vasudeo Paralikar, Smita Deshpande, Sushrut Jadhav et al. "Perspectives of family members participating in cultural assessment of psychiatric disorders: Findings from the DSM-5 International Field Trial." International Review of Psychiatry 0 (2015): 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/09540261.2014.995072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/81809
dc.description.abstractDespite the important roles families play in the lives of many individuals with mental illness across cultures, there is a dearth of data worldwide on how family members perceive the process of cultural assessment as well as to how to best include them. This study addresses this gap in our knowledge through analysis of data collected across six countries as part of a DSM-5 Field Trial of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI). At clinician discretion, individuals who accompanied patients to the clinic visit (i.e. patient companions) at the time the CFI was conducted were invited to participate in the cultural assessment and answer questions about their experience. The specific aims of this paper are (1) to describe patterns of participation of patient companions in the CFI across the six countries, and (2) to examine the comparative feasibility, acceptability, and clinical utility of the CFI from companion perspectives through analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data. Among the 321 patient interviews, only 86 (at four of 12 sites) included companions, all of whom were family members or other relatives. The utility, feasibility and acceptability of the CFI were rated favourably by relatives, supported by qualitative analyses of debriefing interviews. Cross-site differences in frequency of accompaniment merit further study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titlePerspectives of family members participating in cultural assessment of psychiatric disorders: Findings from the DSM-5 International Field Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record