Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCheruiyot, Elijah K
dc.contributor.authorMito, Collins
dc.contributor.authorMenenti, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorGorte, Ben
dc.contributor.authorKoenders I, Roderik
dc.contributor.authorAkdim, Nadia
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-19T15:59:33Z
dc.date.available2015-06-19T15:59:33Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sens. 2014, 6, 7762-7782; doi: I0.3390Irs6087762en_US
dc.identifier.uriwww.mdpi.com/journallremoteselJSing
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/85243
dc.description.abstractDelineation of aquatic plants and estimation of its surface extent are crucial to the efficient control of its proliferation, and this information can be derived accurately with fine resolution remote sensing products. However, small swath and low observation frequency associated with them may be prohibitive for application to large water bodies with rapid proliferation and dynamic floating aquatic plants. The information can be derived from products with large swath and high observation .frequency, but with coarse resolution; and the quality of so derived information must be eventually assessed using finer resolution data. In this study, we evaluate two methods: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) slicing and maximum likelihood in terms of delineation; and two methods: Gutman and Ignatov's NDVI-based fractional cover retrieval and linear spectral unmixing in terms of area estimation of aquatic plants from 300 m Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) data, using as reference results obtained with 30 m Landsat-7 ETM+. Our results show for delineation, that maximum likelihood with an average classification accuracy of 80% is better than NDVI slicing at 75%, both methods showing larger errors over sparse vegetation. In area estimation, we found that Gutman and Ignatov's method and spectral unmixing produce almost the same root mean square (RMS) error of about 0.10, but the former shows larger errors of about 0.15 over sparse vegetation while the latter remains invariant. Where an endmember spectral library is available, we recommend the spectral unmixing approach to estimate extent of vegetation with coarse resolution data, as its performance is relatively invariant to the fragmentation of aquatic vegetation cover.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lccMapping aquatic vegetation
dc.subject.lccCoarse resolution
dc.subject.lccLake Victoria
dc.titleEvaluating MERIS-Based Aquatic Vegetation Mapping in Lake Victoriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record