Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOgot, Madara
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-06T14:47:14Z
dc.date.available2015-07-06T14:47:14Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Engineering Education Volume 92, Issue 1, pages 57–64, January 2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00738.x/abstract
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/86480
dc.description.abstractIncreasingly mechanical engineering departments are beginning to incorporate remotely operated laboratories into their laboratory curriculums. Yet very few studies exist detailing the extent to which this new medium for laboratory delivery fulfills the educational goals of traditional in-person laboratories. This paper describes a comparison of educational outcomes between in-person and remotely operated laboratories in the mechanical engineering curriculum. The study carried out in the 2001 Fall semester was performed using a remotely operated and an in-person jet thrust laboratory. The laboratories illustrate the fundamentals of compressible fluid mechanics as part of an undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculum. The results from this study indicated no significant difference in the educational outcomes between students who performed the in-person or the remote experiment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleAn Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratoriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record