Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaksesvela, B
dc.contributor.authorSaid, AN
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-10T07:30:40Z
dc.date.available2015-07-10T07:30:40Z
dc.date.issued1978
dc.identifier.citationWorld Review of Animal Production 1978 Vol. 14 No. 3 pp. 49-57en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19790781722.html?resultNumber=7&q=au%3A%22Said%2C+A.+N.%22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/87070
dc.description.abstractIn this comparison of data on Kenyan grasses and grasses growing in different temperate zones, Kenyan grasses have higher CF and lower digestibility and net energy content than the temperate grasses. It was shown that Kenyan grasses are deficient in energy for dairy and beef cattle, the only exception being young Kikuyu grass for beef cattle.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleTropical versus temperate grasses.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record