Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaksesvela, B
dc.contributor.authorSaid, AN
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-10T07:35:20Z
dc.date.available2015-07-10T07:35:20Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.citationWorld Review of Animal Production 1978 Vol. 14 No. 3 pp. 3-8, 49-57en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19790449591.html?resultNumber=9&q=au%3A%22Said%2C+A.+N.%22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/87072
dc.description.abstractNutritive value of grasses found in Kenyan pastures (Pennisetum clandestinum, P. purpureum, Chloris gayana, C. dactylon, Setaria sphacelata and Themeda triandra) is compared with that of temperate grasses. The low net energy content of tropical grasses is due to their low digestibility and high levels of crude fibre. Relating the nutrient supply from Kenyan grasses at various stages of regrowth to the requirements of dairy and beef cattle, showed an almost general deficiency of energy, the only exception being young P. clandestinum for beef cattle; protein supply varies widely, being highly excessive in the best and more seriously deficient than energy in poor pasture. Practical consequences of the nutrient deficiences are pointed out and the need for adequate supplementation is stressed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleTropical versus temperate grasses.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record