Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMureithi, Bertha M
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T06:03:41Z
dc.date.available2015-08-26T06:03:41Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/90063
dc.description.abstractThe overall objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of policy and action against the proliferation of small arms and light weapons with a specific focus on Kenya and Uganda. This paper argues that improving the efficacy of policy and action in dealing with small arms is essential to fighting the illicit proliferation of SALW in Africa. The study highlights the consequences of SALW, and assesses the policy choices and initiatives at various levels aimed at dealing with the SALW problem. The objective is to identify gaps that undermine efforts to reduce SALW and also to propose alternative policy choices. The study will, thus, inform policy makers on threats associated with the illicit proliferation of SALW and also propose policy options and actions to regulate the spread and effect of SALW. The study utilized both primaryand secondary data sources including interviews and material published in various forms. The study’s running argument is that the proliferation of SALW tends to escalate and prolong violent conflict. In the end, the study concludes by underscoring the need fora realistic or coherent political and socio-economic framework that expands on the traditional concept of “security” - from state security to human security in order to address the multiple root causes and misuse of SALW proliferation. The study found a response rate of (60%) - which was considered adequate for further data analysis. The study found that the participants had a lot of experience and proper understating of this field, based on their duration of stay in their respective Ministries. The study notes that (97%) of the respondents had ever heart of the concept of small and light weapons, in addition, most (98%) were also familiar with the SALW proliferation. The study concludes that three common approaches define the current thinking on the relationship between armed conflict and development. The first relates to the expansion of traditional concepts of “security” a shift from military and state-defined notions of security to a view that posits “humans”, with their multiple needs and capacities, at the centre of the picture. The study recommends a radical review and overhauling of gun legislation by way of greater cooperation within the four sub-Saharan regional organizations could be very instrumental in limiting the amount of guns and other SALW in circulation and thus reducing their use.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleAn assessment of the efficacy of policy and action against the proliferation of small arms and light weapons: A case study of Kenya and Ugandaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record