Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGurnah, AM
dc.contributor.authorGachanja, SP
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-06T12:53:41Z
dc.date.available2015-10-06T12:53:41Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.citationTropical Agriculture 1984 Vol. 61 No. 2 pp. 143-147en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19840320817.html?resultNumber=2&q=au%3A%22Gachanja%2C+S.+P.%22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/91823
dc.description.abstractRow spacing of 1.8 m (wide) was compared with that of 1.2 m (narrow) under 4 pruning regimes: severe, selective, light and no pruning. Narrow spacing outyielded wide spacing over a period of 3 years by 40%. The greater part of the yield was produced during the first cropping year and afterwards there was a marked decline. The yields in kg/plot for 1975, 1976 and 1977, respectively, were: without pruning, 557, 262, 38; light pruning, 377, 304, 101; selective pruning, 438, 312, 101; and severe pruning, 406, 170, 38. Since the vines were given supplementary irrigation, cropping was continuous but the marked seasonal trends were not eliminated by irrigation. Spacing did not influence fruit size and quality, but selective and light pruning gave heavier and juicier fruit than severe and no pruning.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleSpacing and pruning of purple passion fruit.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record