dc.description.abstract | This was a pragmatic approach to the study of comedy. It looked at how one Ugandan comedian,
Anne Kansiime uses irony to create humour. The interpretation of Kansiime’s jokes was done as
an expansion of the applicability of Relevance Theory in the interpretation of texts. In assessing
Kansiime’s sketches an insight was drawn into how hearers are able to interpret texts so as to
perceive them as humorous. Having adopted the relevance theoretical framework which tries to
give account of how hearers interpret texts during verbal-communication it necessitated that we
define the place of the hearer, and at the same time that of the speaker, since the comedian
endeavors to judge their minds. For a successful interpretation of a text during a given discourse
the hearer must be able to judge the intentions of the speaker, while the speaker must also be able
to give sound context for the interpretation process. For this reason this study alludes to these
concepts by looking at how, the speaker who in this case is the humorist, is able to judge the
minds of her audience, and subsequently judge what the audience will attend to as relevant
during a given discourse. So it is the duty of the humorist to manipulate the mind of the hearer
for the hearer to be able to judge that a given text is humorous. Therefore a successful
interpretation of humour to some extent depends on the humourist rather than the hearer. | en_US |