Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKiburu, Lidia
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T15:38:19Z
dc.date.available2016-06-21T15:38:19Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/96246
dc.description.abstractScholars have argued that conflicts are endemic in society. They have further argued that conflicts are not necessarily a negative occurrence as they help people to understand themselves and their relationship better. It provides the chance to re-examine relationships, and try to make them better and stronger. It is therefore important to learn how to manage it properly. There are many actors who are trying to contribute in the efforts to manage different conflicts in Africa. Although governments play the major role in conflict management in the region, a lot of non-governmental organizations have also entered the scene, with varying contributions to the problem. As much as there are multiple actors in conflict management, so are there multiple approaches to conflict management. Peaceful approach to conflict management nests on Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter that negates the use of force in conflict management. In Article 33(1), the Charter specifies the methods of peaceful settlement of disputes as; negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlements, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or any other peaceful means of their own choice. At the same time, the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) now called the Africa Union (AU) specifies the methods in Article 3(4) as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration. As multiple approaches to conflict management continue to be used in many conflicts around the world, such as in the great lakes conflict system, durable peace has proved to be elusive as has been the case in Rwanda and Burundi. Fresh waves of violence keep erupting. The same can be said of the conflicts in Kenya, such as the post election violence in 1992, 1997, and 2007 with the one in 2007 reaching unprecedented heights. Debates have emerged as to alternative or additional approaches to conflict management that can realize durable peace. One such approach that is gaining ground especially among new actors in the conflict management such as NGOs and development agencies is peace building. This is based on the observation that once conflicts have been resolved, there is hardly any follow up, and so the combatants find themselves with no means of reconstructing their lives. With such hopelessness and sometimes frustration, and with no rehabilitation mechanisms in place, they often fall back to violence, and as expcctcd. violence begets violence. This paper studies the peace building initiatives of the Scout Movement in Kenya, as a ease study of the importance of peace building as an alternative approach is seeking durable peace in society.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleA Critcal Analysis Of The Involvement Of Scouts In Post Conflict Peace Building: A Case Of The Scout Movement In Kenyaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States