Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNdatimana, Etienne
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T06:07:36Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T06:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/96684
dc.description.abstractNumerous studies have documented three anomalies in the pricing of initial public offerings (IPOs) of common stock: (1) the (short-run) under pricing phenomenon. (2) the "hot issue" market phenomenon and, (3) the long run underperformance of IPOs. Hitherto, evidence from the NSE regarding these anomalies has been scanty and inconclusive. This project contributes to IPO literature, by adducing evidence on two of the three anomalies. We document evidence supporting the unequivocal under pricing of IPOs at the NSE as compared to the closing first day trading price of the IPOs. Regarding the second anomaly, e.g. the long run underperformance, support is mixed: there is evidence that IPOs under perform the market on their third anniversary; this underperformance, however, dissipates so that by the fifth anniversary the IPOs are doing just as well as .if not better than, the market benchmark.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titlePerformance Of Initial Public Offerings: The Evidence From Nairobi Stock Exchangeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States