Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMICHAEL, E.
dc.contributor.authorSIMONSEN, P.E
dc.contributor.authorMALECELA, M.
dc.contributor.authorJaoko Walter G.
dc.contributor.authorPEDERSEN, E.M.
dc.contributor.authorMUKOKO, D.
dc.contributor.authorRWEGOSHORA, R.T
dc.contributor.authorMEYROWITSCH
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-18T09:55:41Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationParasite Immunology, 2001:en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11472557
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/10102
dc.description.abstractPrevious attempts to determine the interactions between filariasis transmission intensity, infection and chronic disease have been limited by a lack of a theoretical framework that allows the explicit examination of mechanisms that may link these variables at the community level. Here, we show how deterministic mathematical models, in conjunction with analyses of standardized field data from communities with varying parasite transmission intensities, can provide a particularly powerful framework for investigating this topic. These models were based on adult worm population dynamics, worm initiated chronic disease and two major forms of acquired immunity (larvalversus adult-worm generated) explicitly linked to community transmission intensity as measured by the Annual Transmission Potential (ATP). They were then fitted to data from low, moderate and moderately high transmission communities from East Africa to determine the mechanistic relationships between transmission, infection and observed filarial morbidity. The results indicate a profound effect of transmission intensity on patent infection and chronic disease, and on the generation and impact of immunity on these variables. For infection, the analysis indicates that in areas of higher parasite transmission, community-specific microfilarial rates may increase proportionately with transmission intensity until moderated by the generation of herd immunity. This supports recent suggestions that acquired immunity in filariasis is transmission driven and may be significant only in areas of high transmission. In East Africa, this transmission threshold is likely to be higher than an ATP of at least 100. A new finding from the analysis of the disease data is that per capita worm pathogenicity could increase with transmission intensity such that the prevalences of both hydrocele and lymphoedema, even without immunopathological involvement, may increase disproportionately with transmission intensity. For lymphoedema, this rise may be further accelerated with the onset of immunopathology. An intriguing finding is that there may be at least two types of immunity operating in filariasis: one implicated in anti-infection immunity and generated by past experience of adult worms, the other involved in immune-mediated pathology and based on cumulative experience of infective larvae. If confirmed, these findings have important implications for the new global initiative to achieve control of this diseaseen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectLymphatic filariasis,en
dc.subjectWuchereria bancrofti,en
dc.subjectImmunoepidemiology,en
dc.subjectTransmission intensity,en
dc.subjectEast Africaen
dc.titleTransmission intensity and the immunoepidemiology of bancroftian filariasis in East Africaen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record