Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuria, Benard K
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-28T12:20:22Z
dc.date.available2019-01-28T12:20:22Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/105733
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal and institutional framework governing court-annexed mediation in Kenya. Specifically, the research examined challenges Kenya court-annexed mediation face and made recommendations on appropriate mechanisms to be adopted. This study adopted descriptive and analytical modes of research. The research heavily relied on books, journals, statutes and cases. The research explored a comparative analysis of Nigeria Multi-door courthouse and made recommendations on mechanisms to be borrowed in order to ensure institutionalization of mediation in Kenya judiciary achieve desired result of access to justice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectA Comparative Analysis of Court-annexed Mediation in Kenya and Nigeriaen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Court-annexed Mediation in Kenya and Nigeriaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States