Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNA, Nasio
dc.contributor.authorSaidi, H
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-25T12:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationThe annals of African surgery • Volume 9 • January 2012en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11184
dc.description.abstractBackground: Perforations complicate up to 5-10% of peptic ulcer diseases1. Mortality following peptic ulcer perforation can peak 29% 2, 3. Of the factors that influence the outcome of peptic ulcer perforation, treatment delay is most important and modifiable. This study reviewed delay and how it affected outcome in patients treated for perforated peptic ulcers at the Kenyatta National Hospital. Methods: Patient’s files for the period January 2002 to December 2007 were reviewed and direct interviews carried out for patients seen from January to December 2008. Data sought included patient demographics, clinical presentation, time from symptom onset to presentation at casualty, time from presentation at casualty to surgical treatment and the treatment outcomes. The primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints included wound infection, wound dehiscence, length of hospital stay, discharge from hospital and associations between delay, age and gender. Data were entered using a structured data sheet /questionnaire. The effect of delay as a determinant of outcome was evaluated using univariate analysis. Results: One hundred and ninety three patients were evaluated. File reviews were done for 151 patients treated between January 2002 and December 2007. Forty two patients were interviewed by the researcher during the period January to December 2008. Twenty four patients (12.4%) died. Sixty one patients (31.6%) developed complications post-operatively. Thirty patients were re-operated for the complications. No patient treated within 24 hours died. Complications rate was 0 %, 1.5% and 29.5% for patients treated within 24 hours, 24-48 hours and after 48 hours respectively. Delay >48 hours was significantly associated with increased mortality (p value <0.001), morbidity (p value <0.001), and surgical site infections (p value <0.001). The mean length of hospital stay for patients with delay <48 hours and over 48 hours was 7.22 (+ 1.9) and 19.7 days (+ 19.1) respectively (p<0.001) There was however no significant association between delay of over 48 hours and site of perforation (p= 0.116), and non infectious complications (p = 0.566). Conclusion: Delay of more than 48 hours is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Efforts should be made to reduce the amount of pre-treatment delay to less than forty eight hours.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEffects of delayed treatment on perforated peptic ulcers at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH)en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobien
local.publisherEgerton University,en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record