Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYoshizaki, Miho
dc.contributor.authorRamke, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Justine H
dc.contributor.authorAghaji, Ada
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, João M
dc.contributor.authorBurn, Helen
dc.contributor.authorGichuhi, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorDean, William H
dc.contributor.authorCongdon, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorBuchan, John
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-09T11:48:21Z
dc.date.available2021-08-09T11:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.identifier.citationYoshizaki M, Ramke J, Zhang JH, Aghaji A, Furtado JM, Burn H, Gichuhi S, Dean WH, Congdon N, Burton MJ, Buchan J. How can we improve the quality of cataract services for all? A global scoping review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 21. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13976. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34291550.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34291550/
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/155097
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cataract is a leading cause of blindness and vision impairment globally. Cataract surgery is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide, but good quality services are not universally available. This scoping review aims to summarise the nature and extent of published literature on interventions to improve the quality of services for age-related cataract globally. Methods: We used the dimensions of quality adopted by WHO-effectiveness, safety, people-centredness, timeliness, equity, integration and efficiency-to which we added planetary health. On 17 November 2019 we searched MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for manuscripts published since 1990, without language or geographic restrictions. We included studies that reported quality-relevant interventions and excluded studies focused on technical aspects of surgery or that only involved children (less than 18 years). Screening of titles/abstracts, full-text review and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. Studies were grouped thematically and results synthesised narratively. Results: Most of the 143 included studies were undertaken in high-income countries (n=93, 65%); Twenty-nine intervention groups were identified, most commonly pre-operative education (n=17, 12%) and pain/anxiety management (n=16, 11%). Efficiency was the quality element most often assessed (n=58, 41%) followed by people-centredness (n=40, 28%), while integration (n=4) and timeliness (n=3) were infrequently reported, and no study reported outcomes related to planetary health. Conclusion: Evidence on interventions to improve quality of cataract services shows unequal regional distribution. There is an urgent need for more evidence relevant to low- and middle- income countries as well as across all quality elements, including planetary health. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectQuality; cataract services; global eye health; universal health coverage.en_US
dc.titleHow can we improve the quality of cataract services for all? A global scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States