Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKunimoto, DY
dc.contributor.authorPlummer, FA
dc.contributor.authorNamaara, W
dc.contributor.authorD'Costa, LJ
dc.contributor.authorNdinya-Achola Jeckoniah O.
dc.contributor.authorRonald, AR
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-26T12:01:29Z
dc.date.available2013-04-26T12:01:29Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.citationSex Transm Dis. 1988 Jan-Mar;15(1):37-9en
dc.identifier.uriwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/3258676
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/17115
dc.description.abstractCarriage of Haemophilus ducreyi has not been adequately investigated in men, and its role in urethritis is unknown. In this study 456 men with H. ducreyi-culture positive genital ulcers were investigated. Among these men, 16 (3.5%) had urethritis. H. ducreyi was isolated from the urethra of nine men (1.9%). Of 57 men who had chancroid but not urethritis, none had H. ducreyi isolated from the urethra. Of 106 patients presenting with only acute urethritis, H. ducreyi was found in one. We conclude that H. ducreyi is responsible for acute urethritis in men, but that it rarely, if ever, can be cultured from the urethra of men with chancroid who do not have symptomatic urethritisen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleUrethral infection with Haemophilus ducreyi in menen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canadaen
local.publisherDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record