Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBriesen, S
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, H
dc.contributor.authorKarimurio, J
dc.contributor.authorKollman, M
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-29T13:03:08Z
dc.date.available2013-04-29T13:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.identifier.citationOphthalmologe. 2010;107(4): 354-8en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838712
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/17779
dc.descriptionJournal articleen
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Biometry has the potential to improve refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in developing countries. However, the procedure is difficult to carry out in remote areas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The feasibility of automated biometry using portable devices was assessed in an eye camp in a remote Kenyan community and reasons for failure were documented. PC-IOLs in the range of 17-27 dioptres (dpt) were implanted and a model was created to predict spherical refractive error if a standard 22 dpt lens had been used. RESULTS: In 104 out of 131 eyes (80%) biometry was possible. Failure to obtain K-readings in eyes with coexisting corneal pathology was the main limiting factor. The calculated mean IOL strength to achieve emmetropia was 21.56 dpt with a SD=1.96 (min: 14.78 dpt, max: 27.24 dpt). If 22 dpt lenses had been implanted around 20% would have had an error of more than 2 dpt and 7% an error of more than 3 dpt. CONCLUSION: Biometry is a challenging procedure in remote areas where comorbidities are common. However, without biometry and implantation of different IOL powers poor refractive outcome can be expected in around 20% of patients.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBiometryen
dc.subjectCataract campsen
dc.subjectNorth Kenyaen
dc.titleBiometry in cataract camps. Experiences from north Kenyaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Opthalmology, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record