Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRogo Khama O.
dc.contributor.authorOjwang, SB
dc.contributor.authorStendahl, U
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-02T06:42:22Z
dc.date.available2013-05-02T06:42:22Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citationEast Afr Med J. 1989 Dec;66(12):844-50en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2693069
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/18193
dc.description.abstractAlmost 30 years after its introduction into the management of ovarian carcinoma, second-look laparotomy remains controversial. Although its supporters agree on its indications, there is a considerable number of conflicting reports on the actual benefits of the procedure. Diagnostic inaccuracy, invasiveness and expense are some of the reasons raised by opponents against its routine performance and their recommendations range from limited selective application to total avoidance. The role of second-look laparotomy is reviewed, with particular reference to developing countries where scarcity of resources must always be balanced against the need to provide the best care possible to the individual cancer patient. A management schedule for ovarian carcinoma, including second-look laparotomy, appropriate under these circumstances is given.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleSecond look laparotomy--its role in the management of ovarian carcinoma.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record