Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyaga, Margaret M
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-03T14:12:26Z
dc.date.available2013-05-03T14:12:26Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/18796
dc.description.abstractThe study sought to determine the Non-Formal Education (NFE) Centers' administrators' perceptions of the causes of out-of-school phenomenon and alternative approaches to curb the phenomenon in Nairobi Province. In addition, the study sought to explore the extent to which effective approaches can be emulated by newly established centers. From the literature review, a conceptual frame work was drawn based on two sets of factors; institutional structures and administrators' personal attributes that may have had an influence on their perceptions of alternative approaches to basic education. Thirty six (36) non-formal centers were used for the study, from which 72 administrators of NFE centers were selected. A questionnaire was the sole research instrument. Its validity and reliability were enhanced through a pilot study in which the reliability co-efficient was found to be 0.9. Seventy (70) administrators returned useful questionnaires. This was 97% return rate. The study found that most of the NFE centers administrators (65.7%) were male while the rest (34.3%) were female. In addition, forty-two of the administrators (60.0%) were thirty (30) years and below, while only 2 administrators were over 40 years of age. This suggests a rather youthful administrative force. Educationally, majority of the administrators (43 out of 70), that is, 61.4% were degree holders with 18 of them possessing a masters degree. However, the existence of 26 administrators (37.2%) without University education may reflect the simplicity that characterized some of these centers. Regarding the size ofNFE centres, most of them were found to be small and of simple structures with 52.9% of them having student populations of less than one hundred (100) students. Only 14 centres (20%) had over three hundred (300) students. Majority of the centres, (41 out of70), were located in the slum areas such as Kibera and Mukuru, while only three (3) were in "high class" residential areas such as Karen. The most highlighted causes of school dropout and non-enrolment phenomenon are; poverty in the household (84.0%), high cost of education (74.0%), long distances that students have to walk from home to school (72.9%) sexual harassment of children (72.8%), Female Genital Mutilation (70.0%) and societal attitudes (70.0%). Administrators' perception on approaches to control non-enrolment and dropout emphasized; punishing those who harass pupils sexually (90.0%), lowering the cost of basic education (87.0%), empowering household economically and socially (84.3%) and provision of flexible school programmes (78.6%), revise awareness of education benefits (75.7%), FGM abolishment (72.9%), abolishing grade repetition (70.0%) and formulation of affirmative policies (70.0%). Administrators' perceptions of alternative approaches to provision of basic education emphasized, utilization of local resources (74.3%), abolishing uniforms (72.9%), flexible schooling (67.1%), grouping pupils according to learning abilities (67.1 %) and special programmes (62.9%). To control the out-of-school phenomena, over 90% of the administrators indicated that feeding programes, abolition of uniforms, fees and other kinds of levies and flexible classes, were their most successful alternative approaches to basic education. Regarding the problems faced by the administrators in their NFE centers, improving pupils-teacher ratio remained their biggest problem. Eighty nine percent (89.0%), agreed that due to shortage of teaching / training staff, grouping students and according to levels of ability were difficult. They also indicated that the problems they faced in order of magnitude included in adequate finances, lack of qualified staff, unstable students and unfair criticism by the public. The study also revealed that there was no significant difference between NFE centers' administrators' perception of alternative approaches to basic education and their age, sex, administrative experience and academic qualifications. The study concluded that the NFE centers are necessary institutions, which should supplement what is offered in formal schooling rather than compete with the latter. The study also recommended consultations and additional support from communities, government, donors and empower households economically and socially. It further recommends that the law has to punish those who sexually harass pupils, public sensitization to be through seminars and meeting on the economic value of education. Affirmative policy formulation should be done to abolish primitive practices such as; Female Genital Mutilation and forced marriages. Finally, administrators of newly created centers need to visit the already successful centers; teachers' training curriculum to incorporate gender studies and NFE units, the ministry of education inspection unit to expend its spheres of coverage to inspect the quality of education offered in NFE centers and ensure that such entries are not used as business enterprises to solicit money from donors for personal gain.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Nairobien
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectNon-formal education (N.F.E.)en
dc.subjectProvision of basic educationen
dc.subjectChildrenen
dc.subjectNairobien
dc.titleAdministrators' perception of alternative approaches used to provide basic education to out of school children in Nairobi’s non-formal education centersen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of Education, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record