Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIgogo, P
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-23T12:07:46Z
dc.date.available2013-05-23T12:07:46Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationMasters of Medicine (Obstetrics and Gynecology)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/11295/24873
dc.description.abstractBackground: Manual vacuum aspiration (MYA) has evolved to be the standard surgical method of evacuating the uterus in incomplete abortion. However, the procedure requires surgical training and there are cost related issues regarding its sustainability. Several studies have shown that misoprostol could be a safe, effective, acceptable and more affordable alternative method. By exploring this avenue of management, diversity of treatment methods may be achieved and enable provision of CAC services in lower health care settings. Objectives: To compare the safety, efficacy and acceptability of sublingual misoprostol as compared to manual vacuum aspiration for treatment of incomplete abortion. Study design: This was a randomized clinical trial. Setting: Coast Provincial General Hospital and Port Reitz District Hospital Mombassa. Methodology: Between December 2008and July 20009,a total of 260women with clinically diagnosed incomplete abortion with uterine size of up to 12 weeks gestation were randomized to either 600llg sublingual misoprostol or MYA. The women were followed for a minimum of seven days in order to asses whether the abortion was complete. Main outcome measure: Completeness of uterine evacuation as indicated by history and lack of active bleeding and closed cervical os. Results: Success was high in both MVAand misoprostol arms (100%& 93.8%respectively, p=0.012). Side effects such as heavy bleeding, nausea, pain/ cramps, fever/ chills were more in the misoprostol arm though the pain score was higher in the MVA arm (p=<O.OOl).More women in the misoprostol arm reported being either satisfied or very satisfied compared to satisfaction rates in the MVAarm (96.9%& 79.3%respectively, p=<O.OOl).More women in the misoprostol arm said they would choose the method again and would recommend the method to a friend compared with those in the MYA arm. Conclusion: Misoprostol is as effective as MYA in treating incomplete abortion of up to 12 weeks uterine size. The acceptability of misoprostol appears higher. Given the many known advantages of misoprostol over MYA in poor resource settings, misoprostol should be promoted as an option of treating women with incomplete abortion.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobien
dc.titleUse of misoprostol in evacuation of the uterus in Incomplete abortionen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.departmenta Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, ; bDepartment of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
local.publisherCollege of Health Sciencesen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record