Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJorgensen, E
dc.contributor.authorKaimenyi Jacob T.
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-24T08:15:06Z
dc.date.available2013-05-24T08:15:06Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.identifier.citationEast Afr Med J. 1990 Aug;67(8):585-90. - 1990en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/25210
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1979771
dc.description.abstractTwo hundred and thirty one miraa chewers and 199 non miraa chewers were assessed for gingivitis, loss of attachment and oral hygiene status. The mean gingivitis score among miraa chewers was 1.6 and 1.7 among non miraa chewers (P less than 0.05). The mean facial gingivitis score among miraa chewers was 1.5 and 1.6 among non miraa chewers (P greater than 0.05). The mean distal gingivitis score among miraa chewers was 1.5 and 1.7 among non miraa chewers (P less than 0.05). The mean lingual gingivitis score among miraa chewers was lower than that of non miraa chewers (P less than 0.05). The means of loss of attachment of the teeth of miraa chewers were equal to those of non miraa chewers. Although the mean surface plaque scores of miraa chewers were generally lower than those of non miraa chewers, only the mean lingual plaque score of miraa chewers was found to be significantly lower than that of non miraa chewers (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that the oral hygiene status of miraa chewers was generally better than that of non miraa chewers and there was no evidence to show that chewing miraa is detrimental to periodontal health.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectOral hygieneen
dc.subjectMiraaen
dc.titleThe status of periodontal health and oral hygiene of Miraa (catha edulis) chewersen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of periodontologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record