Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyenze, Emanuel Muindi
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-25T13:20:16Z
dc.date.available2013-05-25T13:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationThe Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: Comparison of Virtual (Teleglaucoma) with in-Person Clinical Assessment to Diagnose Glaucoma, Kiage, D., Irfan N., Gichuhi S., Karim D., and Nyenze E. , Middle East Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 20, Issue 2, p.150-7, (2013) copy at http://profiles.uonbi.ac.ke/drnyenze/publications/muranga-teleophthalmology-study-comparison-virtual-teleglaucoma-person-clinicaen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/25825
dc.description.abstractPurpose: While the effectiveness of teleophthalmology is generally accepted, its ability to diagnose glaucomatous eye disease remains relatively unknown. This study aimed to compare a web-based teleophthalmology assessment with clinical slit lamp examination to screen for glaucoma among diabetics in a rural African district. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and nine diabetic patients underwent both the clinical slit lamp examination by a comprehensive ophthalmologist and teleglaucoma (TG) assessment by a glaucoma subspecialist. Both assessments were compared for any focal glaucoma damage; for TG, the quality of photographs was assessed, and vertical cup-to-disk ratio (VCDR) was calculated in a semi-automated manner. In patients with VCDR > 0.7, the diagnostic precision of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) C-20 screening program was assessed. Results: Of 309 TG assessment photos, 74 (24%) were deemed unreadable due to media opacities, patient cooperation, and unsatisfactory photographic technique. While the identification of individual optic nerve factors showed either fair or moderate agreement, the ability to diagnose glaucoma based on the overall assessment showed moderate agreement (Kappa [κ] statistic 0.55% and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.62). The use of FDT to detect glaucoma in the presence of disc damage (VCDR > 0.7) showed substantial agreement (κ statistic of 0.84 and 95% CI 0.79-0.90). A positive TG diagnosis of glaucoma carried a 77.5% positive predictive value, and a negative TG diagnosis carried an 82.2% negative predicative value relative to the clinical slit lamp examination. Conclusion: There was moderate agreement between the ability to diagnose glaucoma using TG relative to clinical slit lamp examination. Poor quality photographs can severely limit the ability of TG assessment to diagnose optic nerve damage and glaucoma. Although further work and validation is needed, the TG approach provides a novel, and promising method to diagnose glaucoma, a major cause of ocular morbidity throughout the world.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMiddle East Journal of Opthalmologyen
dc.subjectGlaucomaen
dc.subjectOptic Neuropathyen
dc.subjectSlit Lamp Examinationen
dc.subjectTeleglaucomaen
dc.subjectTeleophthalmologyen
dc.titleThe Muranga Teleophthalmology Study: Comparison of Virtual (Teleglaucoma) with in-Person Clinical Assessment to Diagnose Glaucomaen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record