Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacPherson, C. N
dc.contributor.authorRomig, T
dc.contributor.authorZeyhle, E
dc.contributor.authorRees, P. H
dc.contributor.authorWere, J. B
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-10T06:44:09Z
dc.date.available2013-06-10T06:44:09Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.citationLancet. 1987 Aug 1;2(8553):259-61.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/2886726
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/30383
dc.description.abstract3553 nomads in Turkana, a remote area of north-west Kenya, were screened for hydatid cysts by a portable ultrasound scanner and by serology. 198 (5.6%) proved to have liver or upper abdominal cysts. In the group screened by both techniques (2644) 174 (6.6%) cases of hydatidosis were detected by ultrasonography and 76 (2.9%) by serology. Ultrasonography gave immediate results and was less expensive and more acceptable and educationally valuable to the people. This non-invasive rapid technique also provided important clinical information about the cysts. The prevalence data thus obtained will contribute to the surveillance of a hydatid control programme.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titlePortable ultrasound scanner versus serology in screening for hydatid cysts in a nomadic populationen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record