Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPratt, D. J
dc.contributor.authorRees, P. H
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, C
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-10T07:54:43Z
dc.date.available2013-06-10T07:54:43Z
dc.date.issued1986
dc.identifier.citationProsthet Orthot Int. 1986 Apr;10(1):43-5.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/3725565
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/30447
dc.description.abstractDue to the increase in prescription of insoles to relieve symptoms due to skeletal shocks at heel strike a pilot study was initiated to look at some materials used for this purpose. Five materials were examined (Plastazote, Spenco, Sorbothane, Poron (PPT) and Viscolas) by two methods. The first method used an accelerometer mounted between the teeth of one of the authors (PR) to record skeletal shock. The second method used a force plate to record the shock produced by dropping a ball-bearing onto the insoles from a standard height. The results showed that Plastazote is poor at absorbing shock with Spenco and Sorbothane being quite good. The best insole materials tested were Poron (PPT) and Viscolas with the latter being marginally superior. No account was taken of degradation of the materials in use except that Plastazote worn for 72 hours was also used in the study, this producing the worst results.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleAssessment of some shock absorbing insolesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record