Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlummer, FA
dc.contributor.authorMaggwa, N
dc.contributor.authorD'Costa, LJ
dc.contributor.authorNsanze, H
dc.contributor.authorKarasira, P
dc.contributor.authorMaclean, IW
dc.contributor.authorRonald, AR
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-11T08:16:12Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T08:16:12Z
dc.date.issued1984-12
dc.identifier.citationSex Transm Dis. 1984 Oct-Dec;11(4):304-7.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6098034
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/31234
dc.description.abstractThe authors conducted a double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing single-dose cefotaxime (1 g im) plus daily placebo injections with cefotaxime (1 g im on each of three days). Each regimen was given with probenicid (1 g orally) for the treatment of chancroid. Twenty Haemophilus ducreyi culture-positive men received the single-dose cefotaxime regimen; in eight patients ulcers or buboes failed to respond to therapy. Nineteen H. ducreyi culture-positive men received cefotaxime on each of three days; H. ducreyi was eradicated from all patients, but one had a continuing ulcer and another had a bubo that failed to respond. Thus cefotaxime (1 g im daily for three days) plus probenicid (1 g orally) is effective therapy for chancroid. The lack of efficacy for chancroid of the single-dose cefotaxime regimen is surprising, given the remarkable susceptibility of H. ducreyi to cefotaxime; presumably the half-life of cefotaxime is too short for predictable eradication of H. ducreyi from the ulcer with a single-dose regimen.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi,en
dc.titleCefotaxime treatment of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in Kenya.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Medicineen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record