Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlummer, FA
dc.contributor.authorD'Costa, LJ
dc.contributor.authorNsanze, H
dc.contributor.authorMaclean, IW
dc.contributor.authorKarasira, P
dc.contributor.authorPiot, P
dc.contributor.authorFast, MV
dc.contributor.authorRonald, AR
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-11T08:55:06Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T08:55:06Z
dc.date.issued1983-10
dc.identifier.citationJ Infect Dis. 1983 Oct;148(4):726-31.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6355314
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/31333
dc.description.abstractThe emergence of Haemophilus ducreyi resistant to multiple antibiotics has limited the effectiveness of sulfonamides and tetracycline for the therapy of chancroid. A randomized, double-blind study compared 10-day courses of erythromycin base (500 mg) and rosaramicin (250 mg) each given four times daily for the treatment of men with chancroid in Nairobi, Kenya. Of 99 evaluable patients, 84 were positive for H ducreyi. H ducreyi-positive genital ulcers in men treated with either drug resolved with mean +/- SD healing times of 10.8 +/- 5.1 days for erythromycin and 10.7 +/- 5.5 for rosaramicin. There were no clinical or bacteriologic failures with either agent. Fifteen men with H ducreyi-negative genital ulcers for whom no other etiology could be determined also responded rapidly to treatment with either agent. Both erythromycin and rosaramicin are highly effective in the treatment of chancroiden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi,en
dc.titleAntimicrobial therapy of chancroid: effectiveness of erythromycinen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Medicineen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record