Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChunge CN.
dc.contributor.authorEstambale Benson B.
dc.contributor.authorPamba HO.
dc.contributor.authorChitayi PM.
dc.contributor.authorMunanga PN.
dc.contributor.authorKang'ethe S.
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-12T11:26:19Z
dc.date.available2013-06-12T11:26:19Z
dc.date.issued1989-11
dc.identifier.citationEast Afr Med J. 1989 Nov;66(11):724-7en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2606014
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/32188
dc.description.abstractFour antiamoebic drugs currently used in many Kenyan hospitals and health centres were compared for their efficacy on symptomatic luminal amoebiasis in Kiambu, Kilifi, and Machakos hospitals during this study. The drugs were; the brand metronidazole (Flagyl, May & Baker, Kenya Ltd.), the generic metronidazole (Metrozol, Cosmos Ltd., Nairobi, Kenya), the brand tinidazole (Fasigyn, Pfizer Laboratories Ltd.) and the generic tinidazole (Tynazole Laboratory and Allied Equipments, Kenya Ltd). Clinical cure was achieved in all individuals receiving any of the four drugs. Parasitological cure was better for those receiving either Flagyl or Fasigyn, than those receiving the generic counterparts. Both parasitological and clinical cures were achieved in about 50% of all those who received either Flagyl or Fasigyn. It appears that Flagyl and Fasigyn are not as efficacious as previously reported but are still much better than their generic counterparts for the treatment of symptomatic Entamoeba histolytica infectionsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.titleComparison of four nitroimidazole compounds for treatment of symptomatic amoebiasis in Kenyaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of medicineen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record