Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeier, SA
dc.contributor.authorKlauss, V
dc.contributor.authorGürtler, L
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T07:42:25Z
dc.date.available2013-06-18T07:42:25Z
dc.date.issued1994-05
dc.identifier.citationGer J Ophthalmol. 1994 May;3(3):182-5.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/7864930
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/35394
dc.description.abstractRoutine screening of cornea donors for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has been established and has reduced the risk of HIV-1 transmission to a minimum. Screening for HIV-2 is less common. We evaluated 100 cornea donors for HIV-2 and 166 cornea donors for HIV-1 according to our routine screening procedure. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with high sensitivity were used to detect antibodies in donor blood. HIV-2 seroconversion was not found in any of the 100 cases tested, whereas HIV-1 seroconversion was detected in 4 of 166 cases; consecutive Western-blot analysis showed only 1 positive result. Thus, 1 of 166 cases (0.6%) had to be considered infected with HIV-1. Our findings of HIV-1 seroprevalence are comparable with those obtained in studies carried out in Europe and the United States. Data are lacking for comparison with our results concerning HIV-2 seroprevalence. Because of the epidemiologic situation of HIV-2 in Europe, different seroprevalence rates would be expected. Routine screening of potential cornea donors for HIV-2 in Germany may be necessary only if the seroprevalence rises in the population.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleHuman immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in cornea donors.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherCollege of Health Sciencesen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record