Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKemoli Arthur M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Amerongen, WE
dc.contributor.authorOpinya Gladys N.
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T14:07:54Z
dc.date.available2013-06-18T14:07:54Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationEur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jun;11(3):136-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20507811
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/35765
dc.description.abstractThis was to evaluate the influence of two methods of tooth-isolation on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in the primary molars. METHODS: The study was conducted in two rural divisions in Kenya, with 7 operators randomly paired to a group of 8 assistants. A total of 804 children each had one proximal cavity in a primary molar restored using the ART approach. During restorations 2 isolation methods, rubber dam or cotton wool rolls, and 3 brands of glass ionomer cements were used by the operators. The restorations were then followed for a period of 2 years. STATISTICS: SPSS 14.0 was used to analyse and relate the data obtained to the method of isolation used. RESULTS: After 2 years 30.8% of the ART restorations had survived. Higher survival rates of the restorations were obtained when using rubber dam irrespective of the GIC material or the operator. CONCLUSION: Generally the survival rate of the proximal restorations in the present study was very low, but the use of rubber dam resulted in a higher survival rate of the restorations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleShort communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Nairobi,en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record