Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkech, Migai
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-09T15:39:00Z
dc.date.available2013-07-09T15:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationAkech, M. 2011. 3) Evaluating the Impact of Corruption (Perception) Indicators on Governance Discourses in Kenya, June 2-4, 2011. Research Network on Indicators Panel, Law and Society Association Annual Meeting. , San Francisco, Californiaen
dc.identifier.urihttp://profiles.uonbi.ac.ke/amigai/publications/3-evaluating-impact-corruption-perception-indicators-governance-discourses-kenya
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/46921
dc.description.abstractInternational organizations, civil society, and governments of developed and developing countries alike have all declared war on corruption. In developing countries, corruption is seen as a major contributory factor to their failure to attain economic development. Indicators that measure corruption, or public perceptions thereof, have become a significant tool in this war. The indicators adopt various methodologies, and are used for different purposes, including raising public awareness, advocating for institutional reforms, and assessing the extent to which such reforms are being implemented. In Kenya, the Government and Transparency International – Kenya now measure corruption annually, for different purposes. TI–Kenya produces an annual Bribery Index, which forms part of its efforts “to inform the fight against corruption with rigorous and objective research and analysis” (Transparency International - Kenya 2006: 3). It has been producing the index since 2002. It has also been producing regional bribery indices since 2009. TI-Kenya sees the bribery index as a survey that “captures corruption as experienced by ordinary citizens in their interaction with officials of both public and private organizations” (Transparency International - Kenya 2006: 3). It is compiled from information provided by respondents “on the organizations where they have encountered bribery during the year, where they paid bribes, how much and for what” (Transparency International - Kenya 2006: 3). Respondents are also asked to assess the changes they have observed in these organizations. According to TI-Kenya, both the country and regional bribery indices are tools for measuring “petty bribery,” which it sees as “a general indicator for other forms of corruption in a particular country” (Transparency International - Kenya 2010: 1). The Bribery Index has a value range from 0 to 100, where the higher the value, the worse the performance. The Bribery Index seeks to influence or shape discourses on governance, given that TI sees corruption as a manifestation of bad governance. The Index should be seen in the context of Transparency International’s mission to encourage “governments to establish and implement effective laws, policies and anti corruption programs” (Wang & Rosenau 2001: 31).
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEvaluating the Impact of Corruption (Perception) Indicators on Governance Discourses in Kenyaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Commercial Law, University of Nairobien
atmire.cua.enabled


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record