Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhoyyo, Eric K
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-22T05:43:26Z
dc.date.available2014-01-22T05:43:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationMasters Degree In Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/64152
dc.descriptionA Dissertation Presented In Part Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Award Of A Masters Degree In Anaesthesia, University Of Nairobien_US
dc.description.abstractSevere head injury represents a major contributor to patients in the CCU where their care falls under a multi-disciplinary team requiring immense resource utilization. Currently about 20% of mortality in the Kenyatta National Hospital, Critical Care Unit (KNH-CCU) can be directly attributed to severe head injury. Outcome of care heavily depended on the correct management of secondary insults after the initial injury which must begin at the primary trauma survey. The objective of the study was to review the current management of patients with severe head injury in the critical unit by the anaesthesia and neurosurgery practitioners, and to compare it with recommended Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines on the care of severely head-injured patients. The study was a cross-sectional, survey in which a self administered questionnaire was used to collect data from critical care practitioners in Kenyatta National Hospital Critical Care Unit. Consent was duly obtained prior to the study from each of the participants who comprised both anesthesia and neurosurgery practitioners, and there were both consultants and senior Post Graduates students in each category. Data from the 53 practitioners sampled mainly focused on various aspects of severely head-injured patient care. Majority of practitioners comprised the anesthesia providers. The Glasgow Coma Scale was found to be a key clinical assessment and evaluation tool among 80% of participants sampled. On further evaluation of key secondary insults contributing to poor outcome, responses were compared to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and the survey revealed only 20% of practitioners correctly managed hypotension. Hypoxia was correctly managed by 69% and blood glucose and carbon dioxide levels were 63% and 54% respectively. Key challenges in patient care revealed many resource limitations with limited CCU bed space and delayed surgical intervention standing out. Conclusions and Recommendations: Severe head injury management in the KNH-CCU did not meet recommended international guidelines (BTF) and a protocol was necessary to guide current management practices.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobien_US
dc.titleManagement of severe head injury at the Kenyatta national hospital critical care unit; Review of practice among critical care Practitionersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.departmenta Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, ; bDepartment of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record