Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMugwanya, Kenneth K
dc.contributor.authorDonnell, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorCelum, Connie
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Katherine K
dc.contributor.authorNdase, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorMugo, Nelly
dc.contributor.authorKatabira, Elly
dc.contributor.authorNgure, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBaeten, Jared M
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-21T11:36:19Z
dc.date.available2014-03-21T11:36:19Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Infectious Diseases Volume 13, Issue 12, December 2013, Pages 1021–1028en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473309913702263
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/65422
dc.description.abstractBackground Scarce data are available to assess sexual behaviour of individuals using antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. Increased sexual risk taking by individuals using effective HIV prevention strategies, like pre-exposure prophylaxis, could offset the benefits of HIV prevention. We studied whether the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV-uninfected men and women in HIV-serodiscordant couples was associated with increased sexual risk behaviour. Methods We undertook a longitudinal analysis of data from the Partners PrEP Study, a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis among HIV-uninfected partners of heterosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples (n=3163, ≥18 years of age). Efficacy for HIV prevention was publicly reported in July 2011, and participants continued monthly follow-up thereafter. We used regression analyses to compare the frequency of sex—unprotected by a condom—during the 12 months after compared with the 12 months before July 2011, to assess whether knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy for HIV prevention caused increased sexual risk behaviour. Results We analysed 56 132 person-months from 3024 HIV-uninfected individuals (64% male). The average frequency of unprotected sex with the HIV-infected study partner was 59 per 100 person-months before unmasking versus 53 after unmasking; we recorded no immediate change (p=0·66) or change over time (p=0·25) after July, 2011. We identified a significant increase in unprotected sex with outside partners after July, 2011, but the effect was small (average of 6·8 unprotected sex acts per year vs 6·2 acts in a predicted counterfactual scenario had patients remained masked, p=0·04). Compared with before July, 2011, we noted no significant increase in incident sexually transmitted infections or pregnancy after July, 2011. Interpretation Pre-exposure prophylaxis, provided as part of a comprehensive prevention package, might not result in substantial changes in risk-taking sexual behaviour by heterosexual couples.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversty of Nairobien_US
dc.titleSexual Behaviour Of Heterosexual Men And Women Receiving Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis For HIV Prevention: A Longitudinal Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record