Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkulliana, Adam
dc.contributor.authorKohler, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorKinuthia, John
dc.contributor.authorLaserson, Kayla
dc.contributor.authorMills, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorOkanda, John
dc.contributor.authorOlilo, George
dc.contributor.authorOmbok, Maurice
dc.contributor.authorOdhiambo, Frank
dc.contributor.author[et.al]
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T06:49:30Z
dc.date.available2015-05-20T06:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-24
dc.identifier.citationAkulliana, Adam., Kohler, Pamela., Kinuthia, John., Laserson, Kayla., Mills, Lisa A., Okanda, John., Olilo, George., Ombok, Maurice., [et.al], (2014). Geographic distribution of HIV stigma among women of childbearing age in rural Kenya. AIDS 2014, 28 (11):1665–1672en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/83244
dc.description.abstractObjective(s): HIV stigma is considered to be a major driver of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, yet there is a limited understanding of its occurrence. We describe the geographic patterns of two forms of HIV stigma in a cross-sectional sample of women of childbearing age from western Kenya: internalized stigma (associated with shame) and externalized stigma (associated with blame). Design: Geographic studies of HIV stigma provide a first step in generating hypotheses regarding potential community-level causes of stigma and may lead to more effective community-level interventions. Methods: Spatial regression using generalized additive models and point pattern analyses using K-functions were used to assess the spatial scale(s) at which each form of HIV stigma clusters, and to assess whether the spatial clustering of each stigma indicator was present after adjustment for individual-level characteristics. Results: There was evidence that externalized stigma (blame) was geographically heterogeneous across the study area, even after controlling for individual-level factors (P¼0.01). In contrast, there was less evidence (P¼0.70) of spatial trend or clustering of internalized stigma (shame). Conclusion: Our results may point to differences in the underlying social processes motivating each form of HIV stigma. Externalized stigma may be driven more by cultural beliefs disseminated within communities, whereas internalized stigma may be the result of individual-level characteristics outside the domain of community influence. These data may inform community-level interventions to decrease HIV-related stigma, and thus impact the HIV epidemic.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.subjectcommunity-level interventions, geographic information systems, HIV stigma, maternal and child health, spatial epidemiologyen_US
dc.titleGeographic distribution of HIV stigma among women of childbearing age in rural Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record