• Login
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Studies of a prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine candidate based on modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) with and without DNA priming: Effects of dosage and route on safety and immunogenicity

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text.pdf (255.3Kb)
    Abstract.pdf (212.1Kb)
    Date
    2007
    Author
    Peters, Barry S.
    Jaoko, Walter
    Vardas, Eftyhia
    Panayotakopoulos, George
    Fast, Patricia
    Schmidt, Claudia
    Gilmour, Jill
    Bogoshi, Mampedi
    Omosa-Manyonyi, Gloria
    Dally, Len
    Klavinskis, Linda
    Farah, Bashir
    Tarragona, Tony
    Bart, Pierre-Alexandre
    Robinson, Andrew
    Pieterse, Colleen
    Stevens, Wendy
    Thomas, Richard
    Barin, Burc
    McMichael, Andrew J.
    McIntyre, James A.
    Pantaleo, Giuseppe
    Hanke, Tom´aˇs
    Bwayo, JJ
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Background: Two parallel studies evaluated safety and immunogenicity of a prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine in 192 HIV-seronegative, low-risk volunteers. Modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) and plasmid DNA (pTHr) expressed HIV-1 clade A gag p24 and p17 fused to a string of 25 overlapping CD8+ T cell epitopes (HIVA). Methods: These studies compared intramuscular, subcutaneous, and intradermal MVA at dosage levels ranging from 5×106–2.5×108 pfu. In Study IAVI-010, DNA vaccine was given as a prime at months 0 and 1, followed by MVA as a boost at months 5 and 8. In Study IAVI-011, MVA alone was given at months 0 and 2. Regular safety monitoring was performed. Immunogenicity was measured by the interferon (IFN)- ELISPOT assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results: No serious adverse events were attributed to either vaccine; most adverse events were mild or moderate, although MVA resulted in some severe local reactions. Five vaccine recipients had at least one positive IFN- ELISPOT response, but none were sustained. Conclusion: This HIV-1 vaccine candidate was in general safe and well-tolerated. Local reactions were common, but tolerable. Detectable immune responses were infrequent
    URI
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/9864
    Citation
    Elsevier
    Subject
    Prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine;
    safety;
    Immunogenicity;
    prime-boost;
    MVA (modified vaccinia virus Ankara);
    DNA vaccine
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10080]

    Copyright © 2019 
    University of Nairobi Library
    | UoN Quality Policy | Send Feedback
     

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2019 
    University of Nairobi Library
    | UoN Quality Policy | Send Feedback