Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTyndal, MW
dc.contributor.authorRonald, AR
dc.contributor.authorAgoki, E
dc.contributor.authorMalisa, W
dc.contributor.authorBwayo, JJ
dc.contributor.authorNdinya-Achola, JO
dc.contributor.authorMoses, S
dc.contributor.authorPlummer, FA
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-31T08:12:05Z
dc.date.available2013-05-31T08:12:05Z
dc.date.issued1996-09
dc.identifier.citationClin Infect Dis. 1996 Sep;23(3):449-53.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://profiles.uonbi.ac.ke/jndinya/publications/tyndal-mw-ronald-ar-agoki-e-malisa-w-bwayo-jj-ndinya-achola-jo-moses-s-plummer-
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/28135
dc.description.abstractThe factors responsible for the explosive spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in sub-Saharan Africa continue to be identified and debated. One of the most controversial factors has been male circumcision. This cross-sectional study was conducted to measure the association between circumcision status and infection with HIV-1 among men with genital ulcer disease. Eight hundred and ten men participated in the study, of whom 190 (23%) were HIV-1-positive. A logistic regression model adjusted for behavioral and historical showed that HIV-1 positivity was independently associated with being uncircumcised (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-7.2) and with a history of urethral discharge (adjusted OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8). This association could not be explained by measures of sexual exposure to HIV-1 among this population. Male circumcision should be considered as an intervention strategy for AIDS control.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleIncreased Risk of infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 among Uncircumcised Men Presenting with Genital Ulcer Disease in Kenya Clinen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherFaculty of medicineen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record